Mr. Pinup

Sex, celebrities, sex, actresses, sex, models, sex, pinups, sex…

Photograph showing rolled up condom
Image via Wikipedia

Few perishable items have had as unlikely a second act as the humble condom. For decades, it lurked in the shadows with girlie magazines, aphrodisiac powders, and oddball sex devices. Then in the 1980s, AIDS hit and condoms suddenly entered the fast lane. In 1987 alone, right after Surgeon General C. Everett Koop started the pitch for condom use, sales rose 20 percent nationwide and have increased steadily ever since. The key to our HIV global control strategy rests not on vaccines, pills, or saltpeter but rather on the surprisingly broad shoulders of our old friend the rubber.

via The case for bringing condoms to adult films. – By Kent Sepkowitz – Slate Magazine.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Pornographic film set.
Image via Wikipedia

How mandating condoms in adult films will put the industry more at risk.

pic

Last week, several health groups, led by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, announced plans to develop a strategy that will push California legislation to regulate the adult film industry, mainly by mandating the use of condoms in all movies. The goal of such legislation is to protect adult film workers as well as their partners and the community at large. But the industry is already doing an excellent job protecting its performers. Mandating condoms in all films would lead to unintended consequences that would likely increase, not decrease, HIV outbreaks.

Since the industry’s HIV testing policy was implemented in 1998, there has been only one major outbreak. All other cases of performers testing HIV-positive were discovered before they could infect other performers. The PCR-DNA test used by the industry detects HIV much earlier than the standard ELISA test used by the general population. And most adult film performers are tested monthly, while only 10% of the general population reported being tested for HIV in the last year. There are an estimated 250,000 people living with HIV who are unaware of their infection. AIDS Healthcare Foundation and the supporters of mandating condoms imply that the threat is coming from inside the adult film industry. The reality is that, since the adult film industry implemented its HIV testing policy, all but four performers who tested positive for HIV contracted HIV outside the industry. The threat does not come from inside the industry but from outside.

via Not-So-Safe Sex – Forbes.com.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

 Selling sex: worlds best condom ads   Slate
Nina Hartley at 1999 CES Show
Image via Wikipedia

You won’t find “Debbie Does Condoms” or “Jenna Loves Prophylactics” on offer from any of the major porn studios, but that could all change thanks to an ongoing campaign to require rubbers in hardcore flicks. From the outside, it seems a rather admirable way to protect porn actors from the consumer push for risky bareback porn, as I wrote a couple months back. The approach seems basically humanist – or even feminist, considering that female porn actors are most at risk for contracting HIV in straight porn. But, I’m finding that there are actually some Magnum-sized issues with such legislation.

“If I were required to use condoms, my performance would most likely suffer, and in the end I would suffer”

Late last week, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation filed an official complaint against 16 pornographers for producing films featuring unprotected sex and promised to raise hell until condoms are mandated throughout the industry. This is just the group’s latest war cry: Earlier this summer, shortly after a performer tested positive for HIV, the organization staged a protest and once again called for legislation. They say the industry’s voluntary testing program leaves open a dangerous window: Once a month, actors take the PCR-DNA test, which can detect HIV within two weeks of infection. Since 1998, the Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation has reported five HIV cases among actors in straight porn. That’s a relatively low number, industry insiders point out, given the cosmic amount of condomless sex that has gone on in that time — but many, myself included, are disturbed by the idea that five infections over 11 years is considered adequate (particularly with regards to the four cases that were a part of a 2004 outbreak, in which it seems clear there was on-the-job transmission).

It isn’t that the industry as a whole is opposed to tightening its voluntary prevention system — plenty of people in the biz actually support a transition to twice-monthly testing — but there has been an overwhelming outcry against mandating condoms. It isn’t just the bigwigs, who know that condom porn makes much less money, either. Some female porn stars argue that condoms make their job tougher: Belladonna wrote on Babeland’s blog, “If I were required to use condoms, my performance would most likely suffer, and in the end I would suffer.” For others it can be an issue of comfort: “For the women, there are just four words: rubber rash/friction burn,” veteran performer Nina Hartley wrote on her Web site. Remember, porn actors don’t get down like most folks; the sex they have is more like a three-ring acrobatic act that lasts for hours on end. Ernest Greene, a longtime director and Hartley’s partner, explains on his blog:

via Porn’s last taboo: Protected sex – Broadsheet – Salon.com.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Spanish Civil War poster, produced by the Repu...
Image via Wikipedia

TORONTO, July 14 — Consistent condom use reduces the risk of genital herpes by 30% compared with never using such protection during sex, researchers said.

Action Points

* Explain to interested patients that this study showed that consistent use of condoms during sex has a significant but moderate effect on the risk of getting genital herpes.

Although the magnitude of the effect is lower than for some other sexually transmitted infections, it could have a substantial benefit for individuals and on a population level, according to Emily Martin, MPH, PhD, of Children’s Hospital Research Institute in Seattle, and colleagues.

The finding comes from a pooled analysis of six studies that had individual data on condom use, as well as laboratory confirmation of acquisition of herpes simplex 2 (HSV-2), the researchers said in the July 13 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine.

via Medical News: Condoms Reduce Genital Herpes Risk – in Infectious Disease, STDs from MedPage Today.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
(News release: San Diego, CA) Whether you’ve already tried it, or just heard about it, one thing’s for sure – consumers the world over are enjoying the velvety smooth long-lasting effect of Dr. Love’s silicone-based lubricant. And now the optimized formula is available for purchase in the U.S. and Canada exclusively from America’s trusted resource from it’s official distributor – Futuring USA, Inc..  Dr. Love is officially here, giving America another reason to scream with delight in AND out of the bedroom with its purer, safer silkening lubricant for men & women.
 
With a passion for formulating the world’s best sensual products, Dieter Laros has been hard at work in Germany for over twenty years bringing us high quality sensual aids.  So, when Futuring USA, Inc. decided to introduce out a new line of personal lubricants to North America they searched the world over for the “right fit”.  After all their research they chose to work with Dieter Laros’ unique and very sensual formulation found in the Dr. Love lubricant.
 
“It took three years of intense research and development to create these outstanding formulations with the best standards of safety, AND without the use of cyclic silicones. The balance of Dimethicone and Dimethiconol without the use of these cyclic silicones is a milestone in the history of lubricants & glides,” discussed David Dew, Owner/CEO of Futuring USA, Inc.. “We are VERY excited about the launch of Dr. Love personal lubricant line, in addition to the GetMaxxx Ultimate Lube. We’ve always focused on making the best products in the world available to our clients.  And, the Dr. Love brand lubricant is a superlative offering.”
 
Don’t just take the CEO/Owner’s word for it, many others are catching the wave, and touting the lubricant’s excellence. In fact it was recently announced that the Dr. Love lubricant is a proud nominee for the prestigious AVN “O” Award for 2009′s Outstanding Lube, Lotion or Potion. Created by AVN Media Network & AVN Novelty Business magazine & AVN Novelty Expo (ANE), the “O” Awards honor outstanding achievements in the pleasure product industry.
 
 ”We looked at the many different lubricants on the market, and what were the best selling as reported by retailers, and we all felt that Dr. Love was a top contender for the first ever “O” Award,” explained Sherri Shaulis, one of AVN Media Network’s judges and reporters.
 
With the escalating sales and predominant notoriety of the Dr. Love lubricant we are sure to see many more stimulating new products being offered by Futuring USA, Inc..  Be sure to keep an eye on this fast growing company, and if you are “in the mood” stop by their booth at the AVN Novelty Expo (ANE) in Los Angeles July 13-15, and pick up some free samples so you can learn first hand what all the BUZZ is about!
 
Dr. Love and GetMaxxx premium lubricants are manufactured in Germany, and are available in the U.S. and Canada exclusively from their official distributor – Futuring USA, Inc., www.futuring-usa.com.  Interviews, live shot opportunities & bookings available. Contact A.I. Studios for more information, photos & videos. 

 

Leighton Meester at the premiere of Killer Mov...
Image via Wikipedia

Condoms: Are teenagers sufficiently aware of their existence? Despite being the subject of the world’s highest number of bizarre ads, you can never be too sure. The newest ways to corrupt kids’ minds, sexually: direct mail, and Leighton Meester videos.

Planned Parenthood is mailing condoms to college kids in their welcome packets, which would be totally passé in developed regions of the country. But this was in Missouri!

Chief among the university‘s concerns, Smart said, was an ad for Planned Parenthood with a condom attached. In bold type at the top of the insert are the words: “Welcome to MSU!”…

via Gawker – How Are We Tricking Kids Into Using Condoms Today? – Marketing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Happy Valentine's Day
Image by Mac(3) via Flickr

Fleshbot editor [link NSFW] Lux Alptraum has a new piece in BlackBook about the renewed debate surrounding condoms in the porn industry. She says performers don’t use them because viewers simply don’t want to see them.

Alptraum says:

The reason for condom scarcity in straight porn, ultimately, is you: the consumer. Porn companies make porn without condoms because that is the kind of porn that patrons want to see. And porn companies want to give you what you want-it’s how they make a living.

As evidence, Alptraum cites the drop-off in sales (particularly abroad) by Wicked Pictures, the only condoms-required porn company in the States and the movement, even within the condom-heavy gay porn genre, to go condom-less.

via Jezebel – Should Porn Industry Performers Start Sheathing Their Swords? – Condom use pornography.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Photograph showing rolled up condom
Image via Wikipedia

The federal government has spent nearly half a million dollars to fund a study to find out why some men would prefer not to wear condoms during sex. PPHOTO Condoms. Why some Men don t like to wear them. Condoms Stockbyte Getty Images The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development a branch of the National Institutes of Health has awarded a $423 500 grant to researchers at The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex Gender and Reproduction. The Bloomington Ind. based research team will use the funding to study “barriers to correct condom use ” according to a release from the institute.

via Why Are Condoms Disliked by So Many Men? – ABC News.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
condom in the rain
Image by mugley via Flickr

Last month, the Guttmacher Institute released a controversial report showing that the much-maligned withdrawal method, when used correctly, is almost as effective in preventing pregnancy as condoms are. Withdrawal is also increasingly popular: The report cites CDC data showing that the number of women who have used it went up almost 15 percent from 1995 to 2002. Meanwhile, CDC data also shows that as women get into their late 20s and early 30s, they use condoms less and less, even if they’re not married.

My theory, based on an admittedly small sample of educated twentysomethings, is that there’s a connection here between the condom ebb and the withdrawal flow, so to speak. Many of my friends have admitted to ditching condoms and adding withdrawal to their contraceptive repertoire, even when they’re not on the Pill. These women say that they’re not afraid of the STDs that condoms protect against. And to the extent they think withdrawal still poses a greater risk of pregnancy, well, they’re not worried about that the way they used to be.

A year before the Guttmacher study came out, a 27-year-old friend, let’s call her Amanda, started using withdrawal with her new boyfriend. “I mean, there are really not that many days per month that you can get pregs, and if you are pretty regular it’s not rocket science,” she says over instant message.

via Why educated young women are using withdrawal instead of condoms..

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]